Loops through recursion
Due to immutability, loops in Elixir (as in any functional programming language) are written differently from imperative languages. For example, in an imperative language like JavaScript, one would write:
for(i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
array[i] = array[i] * 2
}
In the example above, we are mutating both the array and the variable i
. Mutating is not possible in Elixir. Instead, functional languages rely on recursion: a function is called recursively until a condition is reached that stops the recursive action from continuing. No data is mutated in this process. Consider the example below that prints a string an arbitrary number of times:
defmodule Recursion do
def print_multiple_times(msg, n) when n <= 1 do
IO.puts msg
end
def print_multiple_times(msg, n) do
IO.puts msg
print_multiple_times(msg, n - 1)
end
end
Recursion.print_multiple_times("Hello!", 3)
# Hello!
# Hello!
# Hello!
Similar to case
, a function may have many clauses. A particular clause is executed when the arguments passed to the function match the clause’s argument patterns and its guard evaluates to true
.
When print_multiple_times/2
is initially called in the example above, the argument n
is equal to 3
.
The first clause has a guard which says “use this definition if and only if n
is less than or equal to 1
”. Since this is not the case, Elixir proceeds to the next clause’s definition.
The second definition matches the pattern and has no guard so it will be executed. It first prints our msg
and then calls itself passing n - 1
(2
) as the second argument.
Our msg
is printed and print_multiple_times/2
is called again, this time with the second argument set to 1
. Because n
is now set to 1
, the guard in our first definition of print_multiple_times/2
evaluates to true, and we execute this particular definition. The msg
is printed, and there is nothing left to execute.
We defined print_multiple_times/2
so that, no matter what number is passed as the second argument, it either triggers our first definition (known as a base case) or it triggers our second definition, which will ensure that we get exactly one step closer to our base case.